This Day

Today marks the 53rd anniversary of the death of C. S. Lewis, among others. I first learned of Lewis some months after his death, in a magazine notice, probably an appreciation or obituary, in the winter of 1964.

In The Great Divorce, Lewis pokes some gentle fun at himself in imagining his own encounter with George MacDonald, whom he regarded as a sort of saving mentor. Minding his example, I’ll try not to exaggerate his influence on me. I’ll say, I never read an uninteresting sentence from him, or a boring one.

So rest in peace, Jack, and rise in glory, and know that I and millions more are at this time of thanks, grateful for your life, work, and witness.

It’s late, but:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_UvXe-of-s

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Eye on the Ball

Mr. Pence said that when he heard boos from the audience, he told his daughter, who was also in attendance, “That’s what freedom sounds like.”

Don’t get distracted by the President-elects ability to distract us with his tweeting. He’s a stage magician – watch the off-hand, not the one in the spotlight. Will he be able to sequester his business life from his new role?  Will he want to? Does he know he should? Who’s getting what job? No one should treat the man as a bumbling naif; he knows how to distract and misdirect.

And, for those who know it not, real conservatives, of which number Mr. Pence may be counted, are free speech absolutists. Tis better to be booed than to have one’s boots licked.

Now back to keeping an eagle eye on his boss.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Freakout! Division!

There’s something in educator’s water that’s driving them to long letters about last week’s presidential election. Readers have been sending examples to Scott Johnson at Powerline: here’s his most recent example. This has spread to chairfolk of YWCAs and even to elementary school principals. Heavens to Murgatroyd.

A common theme is these screeds (besides some virtue signalling:  “I didn’t vote for Trump! It’s not my fault!”) is that the election was divisive, as if this is something unusual or rare. Goodness gracious me, any community of more than 1 is frequently divided, and I at least often argue with myself. Sometimes with acrimony. Communities fight. I believe that the collective noun for a group of Anglican liturgists is “a bicker.” Legend has it that St. Nicholas of Myra slugged the heretic Arius at the Council of Nicea. Yeah, the Santa Claus guy. What matters is the resolution to division, not that it happens.

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

My Brain Hurts

Harnessed, the incendiary codswallop I’ve read in the last 24 hours would light North America, easy. One reason for #NeverTrump was always that he might win, and his horribleness used to paint conservative policies with the ugly brush. It’s already being done – Oren Cass has a little summary of today’s efforts, here.

No, Trump didn’t win because of some vast uprising of (mildly miffed) white men. He won because 5 or 6 million people who voted for Obama 4 years ago didn’t vote for Clinton. Where’d they go? Sure didn’t transfer their affections to Trump. If they’d voted for Clinton we’d all be getting ready for Hillary, so if you’re Most Seriously Displeased about Trump’s election, go look in the mirror. Clinton managed to alienate the coal industry, the entire state of West Virginia, lots of Catholics and Evangelicals, and most military veterans. Was she trying to lose?

No, he’s not marching us into fascism. Go read about the rise of dictatorships in Italy and Germany between the World Wars. Both countries had scant experience of democracy, both had large populations of idle and alienated young men used to being under arms, and both Mussolini (who was much admired here in the US in the post WW I era, btw) and Hitler were very skilled politicians and rhetoricians of a certain type. And young. Trump is 70, does not lead a citizen army of disaffected and militant peers, and has never demonstrated any real rhetorical skill. He’s presents other dangers, but not this one. For conservatives –

Wait a minute. I just realized that people who get their information from the NYT/WaPo/HuffPo bubble might not know what a “conservative” is – the writers there mostly don’t . Hm. Don’t know where to start. Small government, small taxes, free speech, yeah, yeah. I really suggest you read Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism (really, it’s lots of fun and gives a lot of clues about why crises are so important) and Amity Schlaes’ Coolidge (it’s really good and you’ll learn a lot about how a conservative president operates. And how Washington DC has been a problem for a looooooong time) concurrently. Take your time.

For conservatives, this election was like this Michael Ramirez cartoon – below the fold, because, well, trigger. See how nice I am?

I think I’ll spend the next few months in another century. Got recommendations?

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Feeling Disenfranchised

My 11th Presidential Ballot. A few observations.

  1. McMullins’ people (does he have people?) didn’t get him on the ballot here, leaving the Gang of Eight at the top of the ballot. Hurl.
  2. In a state that is now infamous for bad government, where the only practical hope is to get Bruce Rauner a few more votes in the Illlinois legislature, the Eeyore candidates for the State Senate and State House are unopposed. Way to Go, Heffs!
  3. When I ran my ballot through the ballot counting machine, it jammed. A couple of guys came over the fiddle with the machine, which then may (or may not) have actually counted my votes.

The poll was fairly crowded at 6:09 AM.

 

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Something completely different

Things seen in the garden yesterday.

Posted in Seasons | Tagged | Leave a comment

Told Ya

Been saying this for months. Wish I’d been wrong. Gee, we’re dumb.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tomorrow. Hide.

Election Day is tomorrow. No happy eve, this, for those who cannot stop their noses at the stench that roils off the both of ‘em. I understand those who, finding one stench more unpleasant than the other, make their decision accordingly; can’t understand those who insist that their choice is fragrant with roses and lilies. Neither of these is a refuge from the other, nor should either be entrusted to be sewer inspector.

Much is made of the bizarre behavior of the Heffalumps in nominating Trump, and to be sure criticism is due. Equally, the Eeyores brought forth the only candidate who might lose to Trump, so some opprobrium should get heaped there. E’en so, Hillary could have wound this up months ago had she heeded Tricky’s old advice: run to the right in the primaries, to the center in the general. For her, Left, then center. Lots of ink has spilled over “Evangelical” support for Trump – I’m not sure what an “Evangelical” Christian is in America anymore – but that support is on one issue only, her probable choices for the Supreme Court. She could have undermined this support by producing some sort of waffling statement like,“I am unwavering in my commitment to women’s health, but I will also defend religious liberty.” Probably empty words, but maybe enough to quiet fearful “Evangelicals (whatever they are)”. But she doesn’t seem able to tack toward the center at all. Will this backfire on her tomorrow?

The so-called “alt-right (it may be “alt” but it sure ain’t “right”)” has to be pushed back beyond the Door of Night whence they came. This was done successfully a half century ago. Time to do it again. They will continue to be noisy and appalling, but no one needs to pay them no never mind.

The Progressive Left wants desperately to believe that Trump spells the end of resistance to the Prog Left agenda. Unlikely, though there might be some delayed effects. They’re not very good, the Prog Left, at articulating why what they want is good, so it’s much easier to claim moral superiority and not have to explain themselves or to shout down than win over. Conservatives worry that Trump’s numerous appalling qualities will be, by the transitive property of politics, transferred to all Heffalumps. I am not sure about that. It seems to me that there is a lot of young talent on the Heff side, such as Senators Sasse and Cotton, and some governors, and it will be up to them to restore things. May they gladly take on the task: the Boomer presidential choices have been pretty uniformly bad and awful, and I’m quite willing to transfer the work to a younger crowd. Stick with fundamental principles.

I expect that Hillary’s firewall will mostly hold, and that she’ll win a narrow Electoral College victory. I have no idea how the popular vote will go. I doubt the various poll margins at this point. I expect the Republicans to retain the House with a reduced majority. Maybe the Senate. Maybe not. If Hillary does win, I expect Republican landslides in the next off year. As for the next four years, there will be

11300855894_de52934201_b

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yesterday

Transient1.jpg

Posted in Seasons | Leave a comment

What Goes Around . . .

Ross Douthat has some thoughts about the election, aimed at pro-life folks who are, holding their stomachs and gasping for air, thinking of voting for Trump. It’s a pretty good one; I think he’s getting something like this: A Clinton Presidency will require conservative pro-life forces to refine their message, to resist each predictable assault on Third and Fourth Amendment rights, and will demand that conservatives stop the foolish and damaging doctrinal cannibalism that afflicts them. A Trump victory allows in forces that we don’t want to come into play, who have been exiled for a long time. Lurking behind the scenes is Douthat’s awareness that the “alt-right” component of Trump’s support must be excluded. There are folks who cannot, of course, be shut up; neither should they be listened to. Reading this, I was again reminded of events of over a half century ago, when the still rather young conservative movement looked the John Birch Society in the eye and said, “No.”

There’s a good memoir of those days, early in 1962, by William Buckley, to be found here.  Early in 1962, the possible Kennedy-Goldwater election in 1964 was considered a toss up; it would certainly have been interesting and unique. We can only speculate what the effect of the Cuban Missile Crisis later in 1962 would have had on the election, had Kennedy lived; but with Kennedy’s murder in 1963, Lyndon Johnson’s election was assured. What is pertinent to our time, and must occur again, is that clear boundaries were set. Buckley, Kirk, and the others found a way for Goldwater to reject the Birchers and made sure that Robert Welch’s oddities did not become defining characteristics. Something very similar must occur in the aftermath of the election on Tuesday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment